Layers of protection-Protecting honest public servants is important; so are anti-corruption efforts


  • The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is an Act of the Parliament of India enacted to combat corruption in government agencies and public sector businesses in India.
  • This law defines who a public servant is and punishes public servants involved in corruption or bribery. It also punishes anyone who helps him or her commit the crime corruption or bribery.
  • The amendments to the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, adopted recently by both Houses of Parliament
  • Section 13 (1) d resulted in many honest officials being prosecuted even when they gained nothing and merely exercised their power or discretion in favour of someone.
  • Insofar as it had a chilling effect on governance and deterred bold decision-making, the amended form may have a liberating effect on honest officials.
  • Besides, it is more concise and restricts criminal misconduct to two offences: misappropriating or converting to one’s own use property entrusted to a public servant or is in his control, and amassing unexplained wealth.
  • By making citizens liable for offering a bribe to a public servant, the anti-corruption law has been brought in line with the UN Convention Against Corruption.
  • The only exception to this rule is when one is forced to give a bribe. This exception kicks in only when the fact that one was forced to pay a bribe is reported to a law enforcement authority within seven days.


  • The penal provision can empower people by allowing them to cite it to refuse to pay a bribe. People may be left in the lurch with no redress when the police or any other agency refuses to register a complaint.
  • Further, it may render them vulnerable to threats from unscrupulous public servants who collect money to speed up public services but do not deliver.
  • The most unacceptable change is the introduction of a prior approval norm to start an investigation. When a prior sanction requirement exists in law for prosecution, it is incomprehensible that the legislature should create another layer of protection in the initial stage of a probe.
  • Public servants need to be protected against unfair prosecution, but a genuine drive against corruption needs a package of legislative measures.
  • These should contain penal provisions, create an ombudsman in the form of a Lokpal or Lokayukta, as well as assure citizens of time-bound services and whistle-blower protection. Laws to fulfil these objectives are either not operational or are yet to materialise.

Source: The Hindu


Comments (0)